25th Feb, 2020: Elizabeth Mathew
This lecture was all about the review received on our videos, including the process starting from the very first narrative to the final video. This process helped us in compiling all the content together and arranging it in a proper manner. It is important to keep the sequence intact so that it is more understandable.
The final narrative chosen by me was different from my initial one. This difference was created because of the change in the concept of time and how it is depicted in the stories.
My first narrative revolves around how time turns into memories and how the only thing left is a recollection of events. The person in this narrative is thinking about his experience on the trip and how things had changed over time. He tries to recall his last visit to the place and starts relating it to the current one. On the other hand, my new narrative is a wide description of the trip. It depicts the part where he first visited the place and what all he saw and felt about it at the end of the trip.
I think what connects both the stories is basically the memories. These make him think about many things at the time and relive them. The second narrative is more like a live experience whereas the previous one was about time which has passed.
Therefore, both the stories when combined together can make one understand the sequence of events. It is important that both the stories consider time to be an important aspect and take it to be a reference for the placement of different events.
The Idealist 